If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/fea08b1a-8008-4ade-a0ae-57cddb3e6f4f are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower
In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.